OVGA Amateur Golf Tour

The latest news from the Ohio Valley Golf Association

OVGA Proud Sponsors

Good Article on Handicaps

August 6th, 2008 · No Comments

How Well Should You Play?

By Dean Knuth
Does it seem to you that you play a few strokes over your Course Handicap most of the time? Well, that’s normal under the USGA Handicap System.

Why? The USGA Handicap System is based upon the potential ability of a player rather than the average of all his scores. The USGA’s Handicap Research Team tells us that the average player is expected to play to his Course Handicap or better only about 25 percent of the time, average three strokes higher than his Course Handicap, and have a best score in 20, which is only two strokes better than his Course Handicap.

A few words and a little arithmetic may explain. A player’s Handicap Index reflects his potential because it is based upon his best scores posted for a given number of rounds, ideally the best 10 of his last 20 rounds. Since the USGA has his worst 10 scores tossed out, his Handicap Index reflects his best days.

The arithmetic comes in when the golf club calculates a player’s Differential for each score he posts. The Differential is the difference between a player’s adjusted gross score and the USGA Course Rating of the course on which the score was made, multiplied by 113, and then the total is divided by the USGA Slope Rating from the tees played rounded off to one decimal place.

For example, if you post an 80 on a course with a Course Rating of 68.7 and a Slope Rating of 105, your Handicap Differential is 12.2. The next step entails averaging your best Handicap Differentials, which your golf club or association then will multiply by a 96-percent “bonus for excellence” factor that slightly favors the lower-handicap player. The next step is to delete all numbers after the first decimal digit, with no rounding off to the nearest tenth. Your club Handicap Committee then reviews your record, modifies it, if necessary and then issues your USGA Handicap Index.

If you have a USGA Handicap Index of 11.6, for instance, it translates into a Course Handicap of 14 when you play from the middle tees one day at a course with a Course Rating of 72.1, with a Slope Rating of 135. So a little addition (72.1 + 14) leads you to think that you will consistently shoot around 86. In reality, your score average is normally three more strokes than that, or an 89. The USGA Handicap Research Team has determined that your best score in 20 is normally only two strokes better than your Course Handicap, or an 84; the probability of your recording an 83 twice in 20 rounds is only one in 50.

A good way to think of the range of scores upon which your USGA Handicap Index is based is the old bell curve that school teachers refer to when discussing the range of scores on an exam. The scores of most players, when plotted out, are distributed on a bell curve from the high to low end of the scale. Thus, when you drop out the worst half of your scores, the average of the remaining 10 scores on the upper part of the bell curve reflect your potential ability.

Now, once in a while you will hear about someone shooting an incredible tournament score, such as a net score of 59. What are the odds of shooting a score like that? These tables from the USGA’s Handicap Research Team have figured the odds of one exceptional tournament score up to ten strokes better than the Course Handicap.

For example, the odds of our example player with a Course Handicap of 14 beating it by eight strokes (-8 net) once is 1,138 to one. Put another way, the average player posts 21 scores a year. That means that to score this well, assuming the Handicap Index is correct, would take 54 years of golf to do it once. The odds of a player beating his Course Handicap by eight strokes twice is only 14,912 to one. That’s 710 years of golf for the average player — odds far beyond the realm of reasonableness.

Since the USGA Handicap System is designed to promote fairness during competitions, what happens if a player’s scores contradict the odds and he consistently plays better than his Handicap Index when some crystal or trophies are at stake? The USGA has created a Formula - we’ll spare you all the complicated arithmetic - that is outlined in the USGA Handicap System manual under Section 10-3, “Reduction of a USGA Handicap Index Based on Exceptional Tournament Scores.” A player’s USGA Handicap Index will be automatically reduced when he records at least two tournament scores in a calendar year or in his latest 20 rounds that are a minimum of three strokes better than his USGA Handicap Index. The better the scores, the greater the reduction.

The end result is you’ve got your USGA Handicap Index for better or for worse. Don’t worry if you never seem to play to it on a given day. All golfers are in the same boat because USGA Handicap Indexes are based on a player’s potential ability rather than the average of his scores. You can do your part to make the USGA Handicap System work best by making sure all “great” tournament scores by all players get posted with a “T” so that they are reviewed and used under Section 10-3.

→ No CommentsTags: Tour Discussion

Circling Hills Results

August 3rd, 2008 · No Comments

First, before we get to the results, a change we’re going to try for the remainder of the season is breaking skins into 2 groups (0-15 HCP, 16+ HCP).  We hope this gets more people into the side games and gives everyone a chance to compete.

Now on to the fun stuff…

In the Nicklaus Flight, Joe Wieland made it 2 wins in 3 events and claimed his 4th win of the season with a 1-shot victory.  Wieland’s net 67 was good enough to hold off Colan Supe by a shot.  Bill Dreisbach (69) and Darin DePew (70) all shot below net par.

In the Palmer Flight, Michael Frank recorded his personal best score (79) in a runaway 5-shot win.  Frank’s net 64 bested Harry Bradley (69).  Mike Greivenkamp and Tom Haley finished a distant 7 shots back in 3rd place (71).

In the Hogan Flight, Michael Coulter notched his 2nd win of the season.  Coulter’s net 68 was good enough to edge Debby Lakes by a shot in her bid to become the first woman to win one of the three main flights.  John Mentzel, Michael Fischer and James Crockett tied for 3rd place, 4 shots back.

In the Trevino Flight, Joe Wieland’s net 67 got him the win in the “senior’s” division.

In the Lopez Flight, Debby Lakes finished 5 shots better than Phyllis Bare at net 68.

→ No CommentsTags: Tour Discussion

Match Play Championship Set

August 3rd, 2008 · No Comments

The Hamilton Horsemen will be well represented in the Championship of the Applebee’s Match Play Tournament. 

In the semi-finals at Circling Hills, Tom Camacho defeated Ron Spencer, 2 up.  Camacho ran out to a 3 up lead after 3 holes and made the turn with a 2 up advantage.  After 16 holes, Spencer fought back to even up the match.  Camacho won the 17th hole and his par on the 18th closed out the match for a 2 up victory.

In the other semi-final match, Darin DePew outlasted Ed Thompson, 5&3.  DePew made the turn with a 2 up advantage that he held for the last 5 holes of the first nine.  When they made the turn, DePew put the finishing touches on the match, winning 3 of the first 4 holes and closing the match out on #6 (they started on the back 9).

The championship pits the 2007 match-play champion Tom Camacho, who is undefeated in head-to-head match play in his OVGA career against Darin DePew, who avenged his quarterfinal ouster to Ed Thompson in last year’s tournament.  The championship match will be contested on August 23 at Lassing Pointe Golf Course in Union, KY.

→ No CommentsTags: Tour Discussion

Hole Of The Week: Circling Hills

July 29th, 2008 · 1 Comment

This week the OVGA returns to the site of last year’s President’s Cup, Circling Hills Golf Course. This week’s Hole Of The Week is the par 3 18th hole. This 9 HDCP hole plays 170 from the black tees, 155 from the blue tees, and 115 from the yellow tees. Depending on the pin placement, The player has either an easy shot over a lake to a gymnasium floor, or an intimidating laser shot to a small front porch. The back of the green is very wide and relatively flat. The only concern other than clearing the lake is avoiding the sand trap behind. The front of the green is another matter. The putting surface narrows to a mere 7 yards wide at it’s thinnest. The front of the green is about 2 feet higher than the surrounding rough. Left of the green is the lake, which comes right up to the edge. Right of the green is a valley a few yards wide followed by a large mound which will save the errant shot from going out of bounds. However, the player may be left with a downhill chip over the valley toward the lake to the narrowest part of the green. The safest shot might be to the back of the green, even with the PIN up front. Anything to the front except a close miss provides a difficult up-and-down and risks other trouble.

→ 1 CommentTags: The Daily Hacker